Footytube.com - Latest Comments in Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Chelseafan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:25:42 -0000

Carragher, Alonso, Voronin, Crouch, Babel. These are the guys that could have made some difference. But they didn't. Your manager sucks "Shiverpool!!!" Your 1st team had their legs shivering of playing at Stamford Bridge! You guys couldn't win Luton this week! So what are you proud of?

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Dan — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:01:26 -0000

The Youtube is down, Dailymotio is here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3t6pk_chelsea...

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

lalalala — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:58:16 -0000

[quote comment="8919"]I cant understand u all people are u crazy or what u think liverpool is a football team (by the way im not a chelsea fan, nor one of the top four) i swear that liverpool fans dont know who is the first team members (exept GERARD, RIENA) U guy talk a lot about history, be fair liverpool NOW are no where near CHELSEA,ARSENAL and MAN UNITED ... when is the last time they won the league ... Dont make me laugh and talk about the champions league ... GET REAL a good team who win the league or at least be in that zone not like liverpool in 2007 15 points difference between them and the second LOL not the first (21 from man u) and in 2006 oooh good it was only 9 points and in 2005 guess what the difference was 37 points ehheheh they where 5th by the way ... in 2004 the difference was 30 points between them and arsenal but it was a good season they finished 4th good luck in 2003 was 19 points and in 2002 was ONLY 7 points and guess what they were 2nd GooD GooD and in 2001 it was 11 ppints difference ... SOOOOOOOOO liverpool fan (sorry to say) SHUT UP ...[/quote]

HAHA YA!!! Liverpool have History but no present HAHAHAHA!!!!!

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

HaMuMa — Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:29:06 -0000

I cant understand u all people are u crazy or what u think liverpool is a football team (by the way im not a chelsea fan, nor one of the top four) i swear that liverpool fans dont know who is the first team members (exept GERARD, RIENA) U guy talk a lot about history, be fair liverpool NOW are no where near CHELSEA,ARSENAL and MAN UNITED ... when is the last time they won the league ... Dont make me laugh and talk about the champions league ... GET REAL a good team who win the league or at least be in that zone not like liverpool in 2007 15 points difference between them and the second LOL not the first (21 from man u) and in 2006 oooh good it was only 9 points and in 2005 guess what the difference was 37 points ehheheh they where 5th by the way ... in 2004 the difference was 30 points between them and arsenal but it was a good season they finished 4th good luck in 2003 was 19 points and in 2002 was ONLY 7 points and guess what they were 2nd GooD GooD and in 2001 it was 11 ppints difference ... SOOOOOOOOO liverpool fan (sorry to say) SHUT UP ...

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

ken — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:55:43 -0000

its not chelseas fault that they beat liverfools 2nd team with their first team, even though thats a slight exaggeration. its your manager that doesnt take the cup seriously enough. who was it that spend more money in transfers before this season? wake up, and stop always blaming others like crouch is doing right now.

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

colin — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:13:18 -0000

@trueblue, essien was not playing against arsenal he was still serving his suspension

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

chelsea — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:55:31 -0000

what a pity Liverguys. Keep on giving excuse dat liver play with second string team and chelsea with first teamers. Its a bad decision by Rafa to play with second team,well not against Chelsea u pity boy.Now see ur fans are giving many excuse bout d starting line up.What a bad decision.Its not an excuse,totally not an excuse.Juz admit it guys, Liver sucks - from Play to Management

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

jonathan — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:34:30 -0000

dont like chelsea because even with al their signings they still cant play football. They have no continuity, no style, no history, nothing. As has been stated earlier their first team beat a second string liverpool ....... well done :p its true a second string gunners would have beaten them both :)

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

pfft — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:34:00 -0000

chelsea basically had there first team on, no wonder they won

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

bertie mee — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:46:35 -0000

AND STILL..ARSENALS YOUNG CC TEAM WOULD HAVE BEATEN YOU BOTH !

" V SIGN "

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

dodo — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:23 -0000

ahhhhhhhhh stop ye moanin its only the carling cup....lookin foward to meting gooners at da final

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Dave — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:25:15 -0000

Chelsea boring? think it might have something to do with long ball Liverpool. Crouch is awful he cant even take someone out properly

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Batimovich — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:08:51 -0000

win is win and lost is lost no matter what!! dont excuse!! I like them both but Chelsea now my favorite to win this carling cup... but I understand why you guys so hate chelsea coz they are super team now no wonder you guys jealous.

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Victor — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:33:05 -0000

SHEVA - forever!!!!!! super player!!!

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Chelski — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:10:30 -0000

crouchie, if i find ya - i'll snap ya in half and use you as a tooth pick - you belong with arsenal or man u and not liverpool with tactics like that

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

d3m0niTe — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:10:06 -0000

What a boring game, typical Chelsea.

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

chelseacarling only — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:14:26 -0000

I guess Chelsea's first team is fit only for Carling cup.. [:D]

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

@True Blue — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:12:49 -0000

True Blue... for crying out loud... Essien was playing.. only drogba and Terry were injured...

Cech, Ballack, Essienc, Lampard, Caravalho, kalou, Cole, Mikel, farreria, benhaim, Bridge... all were first teamers...

I guess u are just another glory hunter looking for ways to humiliate yourself by showin ur ignorance.. dont' come braggin saying chelsea played good footbal after just seeing the highlights... I honeslty don't see Chelsea winning any trophies this year either... Grant won't survive June..

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

vivarafa — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:36:59 -0000

chelsea finished the game with : cech,ballack,essien,lampard,carvallho,kalou,cole,shevchenko....sounds like a first team...the reds had hobbs,sissoko,lucas,el zhar, itandje...experience matters...know your football TRUE BLUE....YNWA 96:)>-

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

True Blue — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:03:12 -0000

LIVERPOOL HAS NEVER SCORED ON THE BRIDGE since Rafa is the boss!!!! DID YOU KNOW THAT???????
Chelsea played without Terry, Drogba and Essien vs Arsenal, wich are the best players in their lines, so what did you expect?

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

BLuE DeViL — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:29:47 -0000

we don't lose at stamford bridge people :)) they had some of their substitute as we did... SHEVCHENKOOOOOOO :):)

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Poka — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:15:50 -0000

U are right , Grant

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

Broken Leg — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:25:28 -0000

:(( How's that leg Mikel you germ!

haha Nice work Crouchie!:d

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

cory — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:21:26 -0000

all i have to say is:

that tackle was terrible.

Re: Chelsea 2 - 0 Liverpool

ish — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:54:27 -0000

sure it might not be liverpools first team but it aint exactly chelseas first team either, alot of the players are coming back from injury and cards, add to it that plenty of our big names are still side lined and it was a great way to boost the confidence level after losing to arsenal