Looks as if Dr. Sulaiman Al-Fahim must really spend on the defense if he thinks he is going to even make the top 10.
kiko
· 1 year ago
I just got done watching better highlights here http://www.veoh.com/videos/v15896124MgjKQfbr and I want to say a couple of things Man City did look superior attacking or at least as good as Chelsea but they have problems: Jo needs to play some defense if he is defending on a corner kick and also he needs to keep running even if he gets slightly tugged if that idiot would have made half an effort to stay up they surely would have scored again. There is some bald headed player on Man City's team who messed up 1 good chance and the Man City's defense has some mental lapses that cost them the game.
david
· 1 year ago
yeah the man city attack was pretty good, chelseas center backs are juts the best in the prem...carvalho and terry are dominant and shut down everything
Gezbrady
· 1 year ago
Chelsea's Whingeing John Terry at it once more... Although Carvalho had yer **** covered... again, you intentionally took an attacking player out of the game when there was an obvious goalscoring opportunity for City. That red card's not going to change into yellow because you are complaining... again. Get off!
footyfan
· 1 year ago
[quote comment="22813"]Chelsea's Whingeing John Terry at it once more... Although Carvalho had yer **** covered... again, you intentionally took an attacking player out of the game when there was an obvious goalscoring opportunity for City. That red card's not going to change into yellow because you are complaining... again. Get off![/quote]
A stupid **** like you doesn't understand the rules. Terry was very smart there, he pulled him down or else he would have been through. He should have gotten a yellow cuz Carvalho was last man. Try and understand the rules idiot!!
Gezbrady
· 1 year ago
[quote comment="22814"][quote comment="22813"]Chelsea's Whingeing John Terry at it once more... Although Carvalho had yer **** covered... again, you intentionally took an attacking player out of the game when there was an obvious goalscoring opportunity for City. That red card's not going to change into yellow because you are complaining... again. Get off![/quote]
A stupid **** like you doesn't understand the rules. Terry was very smart there, he pulled him down or else he would have been through. He should have gotten a yellow cuz Carvalho was last man. Try and understand the rules idiot!![/quote]
Laws mate, LAWS. "Rules" deal with administrative details like how to mismanage a club, nepotism and bribery. Nowhere in the LAWS of the game does it state the misnomer, often repeated by commentators and sports journalists alike, "last man". Unless of course I'm reading the wrong set of LAWS, and as far as I can see the ref could have sent him off for one of two reasons: 1. denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (which now you will argue til you are Chelsea away-shirt black and home-shirt blue in the face that Carvalho MAY have denied the obvious goal-scoring bit, while totally disregarding the "opportunity" part of the law), or 2. Serious foul play (yes, he pretty much tackled the opponent and a good one too). Oh yes Footyfan, I understand the LAWS champ, but not so much the rules part, why these nancies don't get further sanctions imposed on them for the tantrums and ***** they throw on the field.
Gezbrady
· 1 year ago
[quote comment="22805"]yeah the man city attack was pretty good, chelseas center backs are juts the best in the prem...carvalho and terry are dominant and shut down everything[/quote]
Carvalho fairly, Terry just by rugby tackling the opponents or by whingeing a lot at the referee or other random players.
Gus
· 1 year ago
from a neutral fan...ricardo carvalho what a terrific player... super underrated and in my opinion the very best of the PL... all the hype ppl will come crying saying that terry or rio are better well sorry but statistic wise ricardo is far better then them...goals ,tackles recoveries....simply one of the most underrated players
ryan
· 1 year ago
gezbrady shut it u hater... ur just a jealous lil c u n t who cant stand chelsea cuz der much better den da **** u support... terrys foul was not that big of a deal.. happens all the time.. vidics foul on keane was much worse n he actually was da last man n all he got was a yellow.. so moan all u want abt terry being a so called "cheat" chelsea got da 3 points they deserved n lead da league as deserved.. Blue is the color B.I.T.C.H!!!!
Gezbrady
· 1 year ago
[quote comment="22837"]gezbrady shut it u hater... ur just a jealous lil c u n t who cant stand chelsea cuz der much better den da **** u support... terrys foul was not that big of a deal.. happens all the time.. vidics foul on keane was much worse n he actually was da last man n all he got was a yellow.. so moan all u want abt terry being a so called "cheat" chelsea got da 3 points they deserved n lead da league as deserved.. Blue is the color B.I.T.C.H!!!![/quote]
Ryan - I agree with you Terry's foul wasn't such a big deal because of course there ARE lots of send-off offences in the EPL, Vidics included.. I never called John Terry a cheat, just a moaning whinger. I'm sure I'm not the only football lover who get his back up about players who insist on whingeing about every decision against them or harassing referees once the decision is made.
For the record, it's not that I don't like Chelsea. They can play some good football and have some awesome players, i.e. Carvalho, Cech, Essien, and also play a pretty nice brand of European football. Man United and Arsenal are much the same and it gives me the trots when I see my team, Liverpool do it too, but the self-aggrandisement (check your dictionary) of the big 4 teams is not healthy for the EPL.
Oh... Also, mate. You write like a child. Go to school.
BlueIstheColour
· 1 year ago
gezbrady, before you start going on about someone else's grammar, perhaps you should check the dictionary yourself. Now I don't belive that Terry is a whiner, I feel that he is just passonate about his club and national team. He may be a whinger ,however, because I have no idea what that means and therefore cannot defend it. ;) Good try tho mate.
Come on you Blues!! :d/
Gezbrady
· 1 year ago
[quote comment="22908"]gezbrady, before you start going on about someone else's grammar, perhaps you should check the dictionary yourself. Now I don't belive that Terry is a whiner, I feel that he is just passonate about his club and national team. He may be a whinger ,however, because I have no idea what that means and therefore cannot defend it. ;) Good try tho mate.
Come on you Blues!! :d/[/quote]
Excuse me? What shall I check the dictionary for? Whingeing or whining, perhaps self-righteous impetuousness? Whatever it was is arbitrary now, because the ensuing jumping-up and down, waving-the-index-finger outrage that Chelsea administration put to the FA makes the new age of "respect for umpires" laughable. Again I fear that if this was not a "big 4(/5)" club, and the player wasn't a regular English team player, the FA wouldn't have bent so far over while hollering "Yes, Roman."
The FA would be a laughing stock if it were a credible organisation, which it isn't so it is just incomptent instead.
All Comments
A stupid **** like you doesn't understand the rules. Terry was very smart there, he pulled him down or else he would have been through. He should have gotten a yellow cuz Carvalho was last man. Try and understand the rules idiot!!
A stupid **** like you doesn't understand the rules. Terry was very smart there, he pulled him down or else he would have been through. He should have gotten a yellow cuz Carvalho was last man. Try and understand the rules idiot!![/quote]
Laws mate, LAWS. "Rules" deal with administrative details like how to mismanage a club, nepotism and bribery. Nowhere in the LAWS of the game does it state the misnomer, often repeated by commentators and sports journalists alike, "last man". Unless of course I'm reading the wrong set of LAWS, and as far as I can see the ref could have sent him off for one of two reasons: 1. denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (which now you will argue til you are Chelsea away-shirt black and home-shirt blue in the face that Carvalho MAY have denied the obvious goal-scoring bit, while totally disregarding the "opportunity" part of the law), or 2. Serious foul play (yes, he pretty much tackled the opponent and a good one too). Oh yes Footyfan, I understand the LAWS champ, but not so much the rules part, why these nancies don't get further sanctions imposed on them for the tantrums and ***** they throw on the field.
Carvalho fairly, Terry just by rugby tackling the opponents or by whingeing a lot at the referee or other random players.
all the hype ppl will come crying saying that terry or rio are better well sorry but statistic wise ricardo is far better then them...goals ,tackles recoveries....simply one of the most underrated players
Ryan - I agree with you Terry's foul wasn't such a big deal because of course there ARE lots of send-off offences in the EPL, Vidics included.. I never called John Terry a cheat, just a moaning whinger. I'm sure I'm not the only football lover who get his back up about players who insist on whingeing about every decision against them or harassing referees once the decision is made.
For the record, it's not that I don't like Chelsea. They can play some good football and have some awesome players, i.e. Carvalho, Cech, Essien, and also play a pretty nice brand of European football. Man United and Arsenal are much the same and it gives me the trots when I see my team, Liverpool do it too, but the self-aggrandisement (check your dictionary) of the big 4 teams is not healthy for the EPL.
Oh... Also, mate. You write like a child. Go to school.
Come on you Blues!! :d/
Come on you Blues!! :d/[/quote]
Excuse me? What shall I check the dictionary for? Whingeing or whining, perhaps self-righteous impetuousness? Whatever it was is arbitrary now, because the ensuing jumping-up and down, waving-the-index-finger outrage that Chelsea administration put to the FA makes the new age of "respect for umpires" laughable. Again I fear that if this was not a "big 4(/5)" club, and the player wasn't a regular English team player, the FA wouldn't have bent so far over while hollering "Yes, Roman."
The FA would be a laughing stock if it were a credible organisation, which it isn't so it is just incomptent instead.